CYCLIC function of hubris--of the mass of morons bred-up fm now-failing civilization evident, demonstrated....

Below-copied essay by ap first published at comments, http://americansjourney.blogspot.com...95671777249487

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Tragedy Of Human Existence: Battle Of Truth (= Christ) Vs. Lies (satan)
(Apollonian, 31 Mar 16)

"This s**t isn't that hard - but one wonders who is paying for all of the information we are digesting." -JR, Mar 29, 2016, 10:05:00 PM

WHAT?--u "wonder who is paying for all of the information..."?--Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesus Christ, but how dumb can u get?--and this is AFTER u allege to acknowledging central-banking.

For once central-banking takes hold, U DON'T SURVIVE, sucker--they just print-up all the money it takes to buying everything, FIRST on the list being the mass-media which creates the "mass consciousness" which Marx noted.

And remember: it isn't necessary to persuade people w. conscious reason. No, the mass-media is MOSTLY used to work on the emotions of the mass of morons and goons who don't (and can't) think things out.

The central bank begins the (monetary) inflation by means of easy loans at low int. rates. But eventually, the inflation of PRICES follows the increased mass of money which now circulates, the commodities, goods, and svcs available staying relatively static.

So now the gov. (and powers behind it all) MUST begin to doing something to treat the price inflation. Ultimately the only thing which can be done is to simply STOP the monetary inflation--thus int. rates go up and the currency (not real money) in circulation must start to drying-up, "DEFLATION."

So when u get deflation, HOW can people pay-off their loans which were increased and enabled w. the beginning of the inflation?

So now the banks foreclose upon the real property which was put-up as collateral--by means of inflation and inevitable deflation of mere worthless currency (not real money)--pretty simple, eh?

If u look at US history, u find this was always the basic problem, central-banking, up to the (1860s) War of Northern Aggression. Bank of North America existed even before the US Const. was ratified, then there were the two Banks of US, 1791-1811, then 1816-1836, the second one finally killed by Andrew Jackson.

Incredibly, Pres. John Tyler vetoed the third attempt in the early 1840s. Needless to say, Tyler was vilified and rejected by all parties thereafter.

Of course, the War of North. Aggression captured Jew S A for the (Rothschild) banksters definitively, the US Federal Reserve Bank taking effect definitively in 1913, still active, though tottering, now, over a hundred yrs later.

So one sees simple, basic US history was always a losing struggle against these CRIMINALS (central-bankers) and Jews--not Christians, the Christians always fighting most pathetic, losing battle, Christianity itself under-cut, under-mined, and corrupted fm the inside by these very same Jews and bankers and their agents, esp. the "Judeo-Christian" (JC--see Whtt.org and TruthTellers.org for expo) heretics.

Always, throughout this period (post French Rev., don't forget), Jews and satanists found the means to attacking Christianity--how?--by basic means of moralism and the idea of a perfectly "free" human will by which humanity can achieve Godliness and "good."

And this satanic pretense to Godliness and "good" is ur own insanely held obsession, JR--no less than the insanity and blindness of the mass of goons and suckers--INFERIORS, who've been bred up in the corrupt civilization of a formerly successful and "prosperous" society/civilization--HUBRIS.

For reality is determined as it's objective, hence it's CYCLIC, and things can only degenerate in accord w. prevalence of the mass of goons, inferiors, weaklings, and suckers who've been bred-up.

And the ONLY solution to this cultural decay and Spenglerian "Decline..." is extermination, direct and indirectly, of substantial numbers of goons and morons. Human existence is thus demonstrated--once again--as truly TRAGIC, as Greeks taught.

Moralism: the perfect pretext for subjectivism, satanism--only now needs right circumstances in Spenglerian CYCLE of hist....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://americansjourney.blogspot.com...70711950704148

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Moralism: Pretext/Foundation Of Satanism
(Apollonian, 25 Mar 16)

What? (see below-copied)--whatever--the pt. is it's people like u who defend the Jews, in knee-jerk fashion, who master-mind this satanic activity, "raiding other countries like a filthy... pirate...."

And u cuss the heroic Nazis, as u did, who tried to attempt to doing something about these filthy Jews, metro-sexuals, and satanists.

U remind me of Alex Jones (InfoWars.com) whom I'm listening to at the moment on vid, he typically having himself all emotionally worked-up denouncing "evil."

"[S]it back and watch it all burn"?--problem is they (satanists led by Jews) are out to mass-murder the people, "de-population," including us--according to agenda-21 and -30. I don't think "sitting-back" will really do us any good.

Way I see "progress" for Jew S A is its inevitable break-up back into the constituent states and local polities--this is proper, necessary solution which should have happened 150 yrs ago during the 1860s. Of course, if and when one brings-up War btwn states, the discussion is ALWAYS side-tracked by slavery issue and then the obligatory moralist protestations--ever notice?

Thus moralism is what gives pretext to subjectivism--this is the psychologic crux. If u notice, the heroic and conquering founder generations are/were not impressed w. such moralism, they (the founders) being more objectivistic, more partial to the determinist (no "free" will) mind-set.

Thus the Jews have succeeded in associating themselves w. what's "moral," and it sure works w. u, JR, cussing the heroic Nazis like u do. Of course, u're not the only one--that's how satanism succeeds.

The irony is satanism built upon moralism, this given then the right circumstances in Spenglerian CYCLE of history to take hold among the over-populated goons, scum, suckers, and morons who inherited fm genuine heroes and conquerors.

Observe the "Judeo-Christians" supporting terror-state of Israel, the real Christianity designed and intended to OPPOSE Jews and satanists (truth vs. lies).

----------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied--------------

Anonymous Mar 25, 2016, 4:21:00 PM

Apsterian,
Yes the central banking problem - has become common knowledge thanks to the discussions that were mostly driven by internet so-called "conspiracy theories." So the banking thing is nothing new anymore or even a surprise. I see people reading books openly in public about this issue.

This nation - regardless of who is running it - is openly considering torture as a matter of policy.

I have heard many Americans tell me that they have no problem with this - as they put it.

Does it really matter anymore if America dies since it consists of such a populace and leaders?

Kennedy said that there isn't any point in saving a country if said countries values are not preserved with it.

Our government representatives are, for the most part, takers and not givers. They take your tax money and give you a war back. Maybe it would be better to sit back and just watch it all burn.

Perhaps not - but it is something to think about - since we need to think about why we do what we do.

If America is raiding other countries like a filthy ****ing pirate - then maybe its true destiny is the same just destiny of all pirates ...
JR

War we're fighting today isn't essentially diff. fm one fought 150 yrs ago--war of northern aggression....

Book Review: "Is Davis A Traitor?" By Albert T. Bledsoe
(Apollonian, 20 Mar 16)

One of the very greatest of all masterpieces of exposition is and was Albert Taylor Bledoe's "Is Davis a Traitor? or Was Secession a Constitutional Right Previous to the War of 1861?"; Hermitage Press, Inc.; Richmond, Virginia; 1907, 263 pages text, viii; no index, first published in 1866. In this great and most lucidly written book, Bledsoe covers the exposition of secession and circumstances thereof, the Constitution being a compact made by the states acting as agents of the people of the states, etc.

Of course, this sort of Constitutional exposition, specifically covering the topic of state secession fm the Union, had already been covered by several authors, esp. Abel P. Upshur, the great lawyer and statesman fm Virginia, in his "The Federal Government: Its True Nature and Character" (1840). Upshur's magnificent, cogent, and brief work of around about 160 pages specifically addressed the arguments advanced by US Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story's work ("Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States"), which denied the Constitution was a compact made by the states and asserting the US was not a union but rather a national state of its own, having been made and ratified as such by the "whole people," and NOT by the states (in convention) acting as agents of the people of the states. And therefore, according to Story and Webster, the states were NOT sovereign, parties to the Constituional contract, capable of secession and nullification.

Daniel Webster then, the prominent US Senator fm state of Massachusetts, took-up Story's basic arguments (Story a collaborator of Webster, also fm Massachusetts) when, for example, he debated in the US Senate against the S. Carolina Senator, Robert Hayne, in 1830, regarding sovereignty of the states under the Constitutional compact, Webster denying such "compact" and states' "sovereignty."

So the pt. then is Upshur had brilliantly and quite sufficiently upheld the true nature of the Union according to Const. compact of the states and the history thereof in a positive manner, but didn't too thoroughly examine or attack the PREMISES of Story's and Webster's arguments, merely the conclusions and assertions. Bledsoe addresses these premises of Story and Webster and actually shows them up for their gross ignorance and outright LIES. Bledsoe thus EXPOSES the amazing lies told by Story and Webster, Webster nowadays and for over a hundred + yrs lionized by northern propagandists as some sort of God of rhetoric, exposition, and speechifying--when he was actually quite moronically mis-conceived and plainly ignorant, and actually a LIAR for the false arguments he presented and asserted--Bledsoe making this all most clear, Webster actually crass sophist, bluffing blow-hard, con-artist, and LIAR.

For example, both Story and Webster in their works assert the Const. convention of 1787 worked for and achieved a "national" gov., this demonstrated by a supposed resolution passed by six (6) of the states which had assembled before the full convention arrived, but Story and Webster don't tell the full truth to effect this word, "national," was later explicitly objected to and expunged for the confederation of states expressed by the substituted phrase, "gov. of the United States," as Bledsoe pt.s out for us, Upshur having been too charitable, evidently, to call-out Webster and Story as LIARS.

Webster, in his speech of 1833 denies US Const. was/is "compact"; Bledsoe pt.s out how the Const. was called exactly that, "compact," by noneother than Gouverneur Morris, Alex. Hamilton, and Elbridge Gerry during the convention debates, and by Madison himself in his own notes to the convention. Thus Bledsoe exposes another BALD-FACED LIE by Webster, the supposed "silver-tongued orator."

Webster also objected to use of the word, "accession" and "acceding" to the Constitution as he wanted to preclude use of the word's opposite term, "secession." But Bledsoe pt.s-out how the word, "accession," was widely used by James Wilson, G. Morris, Edmund Randolf, Patrick Henry, John Marshall, George Washington, and again, Madison.

So this is the great, additional service rendered by Bledsoe for his deeper research showing-up the crass charlatanry, willful deception, and plain ignorance of Story and Webster, upholding the theory of Southern patriots against the hubris and lies of the northern murderers and conspirators. Thus the "factional" party, as Bledsoe so well describes, of the northern Republicans in 1860 took complete control of US government, including the Presidency even when Lincoln rec'd less than 40% of the popular vote.

In looking-back, one must wonder how the people of the north were so easily led by their corrupt politicians to illegal war and mass-murder against THEIR VERY OWN COUNTRY-MEN (up to two million people killed or dying, including up to a million blacks), the people of the south. But the northern people were too easily persuaded they were under attack, and the leaders were shrewd and sure of the break-away industrial development and general economic prosperity, continuing to expand to the west, as the south was relegated to a mere back-water now destroyed, decimated, and turned into an internal colony for "carpetbagger" exploiters, criminal profiteers, and social-engineers.

It was thus absolutely essential for the Southern military effort, as recommended by Stonewall Jackson, to strike actively by means of a pre-emptive attack strategy, a vigorous and active defense which would have persuaded the north to agitate their leaders to making peace. But Jefferson Davis unfortunately and tragically opted for a stand-pat strategy as the North freely invaded the south while at same time applying an evermore effective strangulating blockade of the coasts. Thus the victimized South was steadily crushed even as the crazed and murderous northerners took fearful casualties as they did so.

But never doubt THE WAR IS NOT OVER, and the VERY SAME fight for states-rights based upon individual freedom and the ascending model of political power, working and beginning fm the individual people up to the more centralized levels, local to state to federal, goes on to this very day (read the 10th Amendment, all 28 words), now even the people of the north and all sections evermore grasping and understanding necessity for resisting and removing this horrific centralized dictatorship, thus urgency of application of states rights and nullification as means thereto.

And it's notable and instructive how consideration of such states-rights is ALWAYS countered by satanic spokesmen of world gov. and centralization by means of the slavery issue and "racism," so totally irrelevant but ALWAYS so effective for diversion of discussion, moralism seeking to over-shadow facts. Hence the only aid for libertarians is, so ironically, the continuing economic collapse and increasing misery of the people, north and south in face of present absolute state and satanic "big-brother" working for genocide and further mass-murder--"de-population" according to United Nations agenda-21 and now "agenda-30."

Jews are liars--who lie even to themselves--MUST NEVER take their word for things; rather, judge by "fruits," acts, effects....

Below-copied first submitted and published at comments, https://www.youtube.com/user/AryanEmpires/discussion

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Judge By Fruits, Acts, Effects; Don't Accept Lies
(Apollonian, 11 Mar 16)

Joel the Jew liar tells us over at his "about" page (https://www.youtube.com/user/AryanEmpires/about), "This is an anti Fascism and anti Nazism channel... I have been accused of being many things, that I am not,... I am not a Nazi/ I am not a Jew...."

But the problem is IF he is Jew (which he must be, judging according to the inductive evidence), he wouldn't hesitate to lie, as that's how Jews operate, Jews foremost liars, who worship lies, all in accord w. their filthy Talmud (see Talmudical.BlogSpot.com).

Note then Joel says he's anti-Nazi--which tells the whole story as he thereby admits he's anti-white and, actually, anti-gentile, not to mention anti-Christ.

So who/what is Joel?--well, he's an amazing abomination, totally, thoroughly Jew-friendly, Jew-sympathetic, and Jew-serving, all while denying he's Jew--so how's this? Observe Joel pushes holohoax and says Talmud was written by Romans.

Note further, Joel says he's anti-Nazi--and who's anti-Nazi, but Jews? Only others who say they're "anti-Nazi" are Jews' sycophants and abject suck-alongs among gentiles, esp. queers.

So again, who/what is Joel?--he's most probably a racially Jew descendent of a Jew, but who was brought-up to pretend he's not Jew, long as he doesn't attend synagogue, who further, was brought-up to telling folks he's "Christian"--which is a lie, since Christian, by definition, is anti-semitic (anti-Jew), Jews defined as followers of Pharisees and Talmud who/which condemns Christ.

Finally, note it doesn't matter what Joel tells us as we're required to judge by actions and the exterior "fruits"--as we observe Joel's serving Jews and Jews' agenda of satanist lies, like holohoax. Observe Joel's blatant hatred of whites as he attacks those who defend the white volk and what he calls "white-supremacy" and holohoax "denial."

Thus must candid humanity appraise Joel whoever who runs the "Aryan Empires" site--don't take his word; judge rather by acts and effects.

Never doubt Christianity is Philosophy but w. a religious style, exterior....

Below-copied by ap first published at comments, http://bellofliberty.blogspot.com/20...l-warming.html

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Christianity IS Philosophy/Rationalism, Never Doubt
(Apollonian, 2 Mar 16)

"Why not take up Tertullian's position eschew philosophy altogether? The Church Father asked: "What indeed has Athens to do with Jerusalem? What concord is there between the Academy and the Church?"" March 1, 2016 at 8:11 PM

To "eschew philosophy altogether" would be to rejecting Christ (= truth) and Holy Spirit (= Reason, honesty, integrity). And in profound way, Christ and Christian Holy Spirit proceeds fm Athens, certainly rejecting the Pharisaism of Jerusalem.

For note Christianity is philosophy within a religious vehicle, form and exterior, considering most humans need leadership, incapable of fullest exercise of reason, hence Holy Spirit, Christianity APPEALING TO INTELLECT--unlike Islam which simply commands, and probably/perhaps the Torah worship which preceded Christianity.

Note further, Christianity surely pertains FAR MORE to Athens, Hellenism (Greeks), and Aristotle than it does to Jerusalem and Pharisaism, Torah probably written in Babylon for all we know, Moses (writer of Torah) probably never even having hrd of Jerusalem.

For how is one to know, understand, and revere truth (= Christ) without philosophy? And verily, philosophy (necessary part to Holy Spirit) is necessary means of grasping, knowing, and revering that precious truth (= Christ).

"Beleeeeeeeeeeeeeevin'" is poor substitute for knowing and understanding, never doubt. And Christian truth is NOT "absurd" as Tertulian seemed to imagine.

---------------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------

Liberty Bell said...
I mean, look: Plato's Forms are (I think) properly situated along the hypothetical "debate" above regarding somersaults. The question between Plato and Aristotle was NOT: "Is there an objective reality?" Both philosophers affirmed that. The question is simply: On our most accurate inventory of existing things, would Forms be on that list or not?

Your assertion that the "Denial Of Aristotelian Objective Reality Is Simply TREASON And Suicide" is, by my lights, tantamount to saying that that only the seconed view about somersaults is permissible because the first is "treasonous" (whatever that's supposed to mean, here) or "suidical." I can scarcely believe that you are serious.

Hopefully, you just got a bit carried away rhetorically. It happens to the best of us. But, as a fellow Christian, I would be remiss if I did not gently caution you that such grandiloquence comes awfully close to being uncharitable.

As proverbial Christian wisdom has it: In essentials, unity; in inessentials, liberty; in all things, charity."

Yes, Jesus is the Truth! That's an essential. But "Thou shalt not endorse Forms"? Even if I might be inclined to agree with you (and notice that I nowhere declare myself a "Platonist") I don't find that "commandment" in Exodus. Surely, it is more plausible to regard these abstruse metaphysical matters as inessential than it is to demand that all Christians be Aristotelians! After all, it is well-known that Aristotle's "god" - the "unmoved mover" embraced by later deists - is hardly the God of the Bible. Why not take up Tertullian's position eschew philosophy altogether? The Church Father asked: "What indeed has Athens to do with Jerusalem? What concord is there between the Academy and the Church?" (De praescriptione haereticorum, chapt. vii.)

In any case, thanks for the comments! They are always welcome :-)
March 1, 2016 at 8:11 PM