Notes upon the subject of money

---

Upon The Subject Of Money (And Currency)
(Apollonian, 22 Aug 17)

I made a vid w. Brian Ruhe, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOfw5d2_LH4&t=69s. And in the comments underneath the vid we had someone ck-ing in and telling some lies and mis-representations about money. So here is the comment and my responses following:


Electric Universe 10 hours ago

Apollonian had a few errors in his presentation. The one I want to bring up is about money. Who money serves is based upon its definition. Today's money is credit/debit based money which serves the jewish bankers. Money based upon a commodity, such as gold and/or silver, is wealth based money and serves the rich with the resources. National money serves the people; this is the same money Hitler authorized for use for Germany. Hitler allowed a jewish banker to keep his position due to him not being a communist and two programs were instituted, which created the Reichsmark that served the German people.

Money is always authorized under LAW of government no matter what historically; therefore, it is a jewish lie that claims government cannot be trusted with the money supply. Bill Still has faults, but this opinion of his of the government controlling the money is not a fault as history shows. The jews are using government laws in their favor to control the money supply today. Why not create laws that favor the people? Please read Stephen Zarlenga's historical book on money called "The Lost Science of Money."

I guess I will bring up a second major flaw of Apollonian's incomplete research. Hitler had no financing from the jews or the west before coming to power. Complete fabrication. After he was in power, of course there was money from investors just as with all nations of the world, especially western. And, the Bush family funding Hitler is completely erroneous. Please investigage Veronica Clarke's research into all of this, or Michael Collins Piper, or Deanna Spingola and many others. They all fact checked these claims by people who made such allegation within famous book, etc., and they are all false.

----------------------------------

Apollonian Apollonius 7 hours ago
U're soooo full of the usual, brainless moronic ****, EU. (a) First, u don't understand even what "money" is, which is necessarily commodity-based, w. "intrinsic" value--a commodity w. it's own trade-value, used then as a medium of exchange. Real money doesn't change the basic BARTER relation of "TRADE"--know what that means?--trade is done by means of money, aside fm plain swapping of one commodity for another. Money precedes "government." Money then, properly understood as commodity-based, also serves as store of value, naturally. U confuse real money, as I've described, now w. "currency" which is counterfeit, fraud, imposed on people by dictatorship and "legal tender" laws. Purpose of "currency" is "inflation," to be done later, by means of replication of the currency units.

REAL MONEY DOESN'T REQUIRE GOVERNMENTS, dumbass--why would it? But real, honest governments WOULD properly ban fiat currencies as does US Constitution. U're just basically, and totally full of purest, putrid **** that stinks. Best ref. for money is at Mises.org.

(b) U further lie hugely about unc' Adolf not being funded by kikes, at least indirectly--Jews knew perfectly well Hitler was getting money (actually CURRENCY and currency-backed funding) through channels which originated w. the kikes at top of things who totally controlled practically all int. trade fm well into the 19th cent. Jews WANTED another war to consolidate things and especially to "rope-in" Jew S A, protect and legitimize Bolsheviks as well as Israeli terror-state. Easy, simple source on Hitler's financing is Antony C. Sutton's "Wall Street...," works. Another useful source is "Who Financed Hitler," by the Pooles, brother and sister authors.


Apollonian Apollonius 1 second ago
Notice the piece-of-**** liar writes above: "Money is always authorized under LAW of government no matter what historically;...." Fact is REAL MONEY (not "currency"), commodity-based, gold/silver being best, PRECEDES any gov., and needs no gov. to make "legal tender" laws, FORCING the people to accept it for goods/svcs. What the piece-of-**** is really talking about is that criminal dictatorships impose CURRENCY which then requires "legal-tender" laws enforcing such intrinsically worthless currency upon the people. The piece-of-**** liar then invokes "history" ("...as history shows"). And hist. does indeed show that a gold/silver money system ALWAYS leads to prosperity, FOR ALL THE PEOPLE, as in case of USA, now the Jew S A. And currency systems are mere dicatatorships, by definition, and ALWAYS lead to disaster, war, and impoverishment of the people.


Apollonian Apollonius 1 second ago
One other note to be made--and there might be more--regarding the lies and deceptions of EU, above, is Mike Collins Piper knows little to nothing of money, and I'm not aware of any works of his that cover the subject. The lying moron scum is just babbling and dropping names. Deanna Spingola is a Jewwy mouth-piece for AmericanFreePress.net who along w. the Jewwy Keith Johnson pushes the Sandy hoax lies in which it is alleged the fictional "Adam Lanza" killed 27 people, including his fictional mom, and then 26 others at Sandy hoax elementary. So let this all tell u what a Jewwy lying liar is "electric universe."


Apollonian Apollonius 12 seconds ago

Ho ho ho, and what's this?--why should anyone read Zarlenga's book?--what would it say?--the lying piece-of-****, "electric universe," doesn't tell us, but merely implies everyone has to read-up on some idiot book to catch-up w. this lying scum, ho ho ho ho ho. And we never said Bush family "funded" Hitler; we merely pt'd out Prescott Bush senior worked for Harriman who did business w. the German gov., this easily found and verified in A.C. Sutton's works, for example, mentioned in above notes.

"[I]t is a jewish lie that claims government cannot be trusted with the money supply"?--it's simple, easily verified fact all fiat money schemes, founded in dictatorship and "legal tender" laws, collapse, as I noted, in horrific disasters, bankruptcies, and wars--look at present petro-dollar, collapsing before our very eyes. And it should be OBVIOUS gov. has no business whatsoever imposing currency schemes and frauds upon the people, proper gov. designed merely to protecting people's rights, hence banning frauds precisely like the sort of fraudulent criminal enterprises this piece-of-****, EU, advocates--as when US Const. prohibited state governments emitting "bills of credit."


Apollonian:
Listen to the liar who lies (fm above): "Today's money is credit/debit based money which serves the jewish bankers." No stupid, it's CURRENCY w. no intrinsic worth, HENCE IT'S NOT "MONEY" AT ALL. And the purpose of "currency" systems is to INFLATE, meaning legally COUNTERFEITING, proliferating and replicating the currency units, making them even more worthless. U're just a liar who lies for sake of criminals, Jew or non-Jew.



Classic, landmark, masterpiece of WWII dis-info by AJP Taylor: "Origins of the Second World War"....

---

Classic Dis-Info, Artist And Work: AJP Taylor's "Origins Of The Second World War"
(Apollonian, 14 Aug 17)

I just now finished re-reading AJP Taylor's old "classic" (it was, but not any longer, these days, in age of I-net) dis-info, "Origins of the Second World War," this one I've just read being the 2005 edition, originally published in 1961, Simon and Shuster Inc., NY, etc., 296 pp, xxviii, 278 text, bibliography, index, including a couple of maps.

Taylor's work was notable for having opined he thought Britain and Poland were more responsible for outbreak of WWII than Germany--as after all, it was Poles who deliberately started it all (see http://www.nnnforum.com/forums/showt...light=docherty), demanding to take the German city of Danzig, amongst other aggressions, but Hitler making clear Danzig would return to Germany, and Brits who actually declared the war their Polish allies started and provoked. Had Brits not declared war, then there would have been no war, obviously.

Interesting and telling is Taylor expounding upon economics, no less, as the 1930s depression was circumstance for Hitler and Nazi party being so popular in Germany, the actual occasion for bringing them to definitive political power. Thus Taylor says, on p. 61, chapt. 4, "International stability was first shaken by the collapse of economic stability in the great Depression which began in October 1929. The Depression had little to do with the preceding war, though men did not think so at the time. It had nothing to do with the surviving provisions of the peace-treaty. The Depression was started by the collapse of a speculative boom in the United States; and the unemployment which followed was swelled by the failure of purchasing power to keep pace with the increased resources of production. Everyone understands this now; just as they know that the way out of a depression is to increase government spending. In 1929 hardly anyone knew it; and the few who did had no influence on policy. It was generally believed that deflation was the only cure. There must be sound money, balanced budgets, cuts in government expenditure, and reductions in wages. Then presumably, prices would somehow become low enough for people to start buying again."

Did u catch that?--"unemployment . . . was swelled by the failure of purchasing power to keep pace w. the increased resources of production"?--this hardly makes any sense, but then Taylor says, "[e]veryone understands this now...," ho o ho ho ho. And "the way out of a depression is to increase gov. spending"--isn't this just brilliant? So much for Taylor the economist or economic historian. But there's more.

Later in chapt. 6, p. 118, Taylor goes on about German economic production and re-armament under Hitler: "The British government feared to offend economic principle even more than to offend Hitler. The secret of Pandora's box which Schacht had opened in Germany and which the American New Deal had also revealed, was still unknown to them. Wedded to stable prices and a stable pound, they regarded increased public spending as a great evil, excusable only in the event of actual war, and even then lamentable. They had no inkling that public spending on anything, even on armaments, brought with it increased prosperity. Like nearly all contemporary economists except of course J. M. Keynes, they still treated public finance as though it were the finance of a private individual. When an individual spends money on wasteful objects, he has less to spend elsewhere, and there is less "demand." When the state spends money, this creates an increased "demand," and therefore increased prosperity, throughout the community. This is obvious to us now. Few knew it then. Before we condemn Baldwin and Neville Chamberlain too contemptuously, we should reflect that even in 1959 an economist was elevated to the House of Lords for preaching the very doctrine of public miserliness which stultified British policy before 1939. Perhaps we are not more enlightened; merely more fearful of the popular explosion which would be caused if the economists got their way, and there was a return to mass unemployment. Before 1939 this unemployment was regarded as a law of nature; and the government could claim, in all sincerity, that there were no unused resources in the country when nearly two million men remained unemployed.

"Here again, Hitler had a great advantage over the democratic countries. His principal achievement was the conquest of unemployment; and most Germans did not mind what heretical methods he used, so long as he did it. Moreover, even if German bankers objected, they had no effective means of saying so. When Schacht himself grew anxious, he could only resign; and few Germans cared. A dictatorship like Hitler's could escape the usual consequences of inflation. Since there were no trade unions, exchange control--backed by the weapons of terror and the secret police--prevented any depreciation of the mark. The British government still lived in the psychological atmosphere of 1931: more terrified of a flight from the pound than of defeat in war. Its measures of rearmament were therefore determined less by strategic need, even if that had been known, than by what the taxpayer would stand; and he, constantly assured that the government had already made Great Britain strong, would not stand much. Limitation of income-tax, and the confidence of the City of London, came first; armaments came second. Under such circumstances, it is not necessary to invoke the opposition of the Labour party in order to understand why British preparations for war before 1939 lagged behind those of Germany. The wonder is rather that, when war came, Great Britain was as well prepared as she was--a triumph of scientific and technical ingenuity over the economists."

Again, note (fm above) Taylor's smug and utterly idiot presumption, "[w]hen the state spends money, this creates an increased "demand," and therefore increased prosperity, throughout the community." Golly, gee, but it's "obvious to us now," he assuringly says, ho ho ho ho.

Thus is Taylor's general exposition on WWII, smug, presumptuous, contemptuous, but also glib, fast-paced, and rather smoothly written for an economic 278 pages--it all went over quite well for the 1960s with only the little problem for not demonizing Hitler and Germans for "starting" the war w. the "cruel invasion" of Poland, etc.

So what Taylor's work does do for us is to reveal the purpose of his publishers and the deep-state behind them: (a) it covers the deep-state, Taylor patronizingly belittling and dismissing "Chatham House," the British equivalent of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) here in Jew S A; (b) it normalizes the Bolshevik USSR, taking and considering them as just another country among all the other nations who were appalled by Hitler and "Nazi" Germany.

(c) Taylor additionally covers the deep-state's extremely significant, newly instituted instrument of world dictatorship, the "League of Nations"--he tells us (p. 39): "...there was a deep, underlying divergence between England and France as to the nature of the League. The French wanted the League to develop into a system of security directed against Germany; the British regarded it as a system of conciliation which would include Germany."

(d) And there was not the slightest word fm Taylor in his entire work about the British imperial take-over of former territory of Ottomans, Palestine, due to become site of "Israel," world dictator and arbiter, soon-to-be ruler of Jew S A, proverbial "tail" wagging the "dog," which "dog," for the moment, however, was necessary for other purposes, as in the coming second world war being prepared and planned by satanic deep-state for whom Taylor is covering and apologizing, pretending Neville Chamberlain and his cohort, Lord Halifax, weren't intending war fm the beginning.

(e) And of course, Taylor has too little to say about how deep-state provoked and started the first world war, in the first place--it's not part of official deep-state narrative, tune for which Taylor is definitive maestro. (See http://www.nnnforum.com/forums/showt...light=docherty) For note deep-state is founded upon that top, ruling, and definitive criminal enterprise, the central-bank legalized counterfeiting, and we see how Taylor handles that problem in his economic discussion as we noted in some detail, above. As far as Taylor is concerned central-banking is just normal business practice, nothing further to see or note, ho hum.

Thus we see the truly interesting nature of AJP Taylor and his devilish work, "Origins...": the book is actually sublime dis-info and was surely extremely effective for the time, serving as diversion for the real designs of deep-state by means of the cause-of-war controversy, seeming to excuse arch-demon, Hitler--this was sure to attract maximum attn. Thus the work is genuine and quite notable land-mark of the dis-info art so well and effectively elaborated in a full-fledged book production which kept people and scholars occupied for decades. Taylor actually deserves credit as artist of dis-info most cleverly dispensed and sold, and scholars should take due note.