Rule-of-law?--depends on that OBJECTIVISTIC view of reality at "git-go" for all philosophy....

Below-copied by ap first submitted, but then deleted by kike filth, at comments, https://mises.org/blog/myth-rule-law#disqus_thread

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"Rule-Of-Law" Is Vestige Of Objective View Of Reality
(Apollonian, 9 May 17)

Liberate fm stupidity?--ho ho ho ho--good luck, suckers, ho o oh o ho. U should consider Oswald Spengler's "Decline of the West," whence he observes the Romans as all-time example, who began w. honest farmers, who may have been "superstitious" and ignorant, but were generally objectively-oriented, assuming without question the objective (Aristotelian) reality.

But as the Roman state became evermore successful and "prosperous," what happened?--the following corrupt generations fm the founders became perverted, not having to fight for what they inherited fm their genuinely brave, honest, admirable forbears. These inheritor generations became SUBJECTIVISTIC and hubristic, pretending to God-like, perfectly "free" will and MORALITY of "good-evil" which is not founded in objective, determinist (absolute cause-effect) reality.

Note then rule-of-law is necessarily OBJECTIVISTIC, and the anti-thesis is subjectivist (anything goes, but necessary in order to have otherwise non-existent "good-evil"). Note further, subjectivism is idea mind/consciousness creates reality, the more extreme version being SATANISM, making oneself God, the most sophisticated version of satanism being necessarily collectivistic, agreeing upon some end, and cooperating intensively to bringing it about. So note denial of rule-of-law is simply a satanic ideal and principle, pure and simple.


--------------------------------------------------------

generalisimo Don Duncan • 4 hours ago

The "rule of law" references natural law, rationally derived from objective truth. Not the arbitrary "rule of men," which follows from nihilism. The rule of law would respect human rights above any other concern. That power lies and criminals aggress does nothing to discredit natural law, the rule of law, or the human rights of life, liberty, and property. Do you believe human beings have rights?


apollonian generalisimo • in a few seconds

U got it, general. Objective view is hated by the moralists, as objective view is DETERMINISTIC (absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free," God-like human will). Subjectivists want to make room for non-existent "moral virtue," and esp. "good-evil." But problem is subjectivism soon gives way to extreme subjectivism, idea reality is strictly creation of mind/consciousness, making oneself God--SATANISM--and that's what's ruling presently, the culture of death, poison vaccines, prescription drugs, poison GMO foods and -additives, poison fluoridated water supplies, poison "chem-trails," etc., saying all this is good for "reducing population" in accord w. United Nations Agenda-21 and 2030 addendum.