Defenders of Yankee genocide of 1860s are stupid liars, truly....

Below-copied by ap first submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/pgottfried/the-de...tism/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Constitution Is "Supreme," But Laws Must Be Duly Constitutional To Be Valid
(Apollonian, 24 Dec 18)

"Elite...": don't forget, a committed Christian, hence anti-semite, like myself, suffers a certain problem and circumstance which is I'm being HEAVILY censored on this site, and my replies and responses aren't all showing up--like, for example, my response to ur pathetic babbling about what is written in New Test. about Jews, on the other thread--it was censored and deleted by the editor, so don't think I didn't have a cogent, substantial statement for u. I also had a cogent response to Unz's "open ltr" which he deleted, giving the LIE to Unz's pretended "light-hand" for censorship, ho ho ho ho. Unz is the TYPICAL Jew, never doubt.

But here's ur problem for the "supremacy clause," buddy: IT WAS ALREADY COVERED by Jefferson and Madison over a two hundred yrs ago. Laws are only "supreme" as they're duly CONSTITUTIONAL, and the state decides, NOT the Supreme Court which is naturally biased in favor of the federal gov't.

Union is NOT "supreme," stupid, and NO "state ratified acknowledging the supremacy of the union"--u're just a brainless, moronic liar--u must be a Jew, right? Union has "delegated powers" to act in regard to foreign powers, for example, to exclusion of states, but otherwise the states are sovereign, and regarding such delegated powers, those powers can be duly un-delegated, in accord w. the law of contract and the sovereignty of the states--which happened in 1860s, in 1787 and 1788, and previous to those in 1776. Read the "Declaration of Secession"--oh excuse me, I meant the Declaration of Independence, sucker.

Now listen, fool: the states simply made a Constitutional Contract WITH THE OTHER STATES, no one else, which Calhoun and others called a "compact." States thus created a SUBORDINATE agency, called the "union" which acted as agent to foreign powers, etc.--the union represented the states.

The states HAVE NO SUPERIOR, as they're sovereign, the union having ONLY "delegated powers," which are quite retractable and withdrawn, which is what Confederate states did, forming their own gov., as provided in the US Declaration of Independence--ever hrd of it?

States are sovereign, NOT THE UNION, and sovereignty is un-alienable. And there is NOTHING in the Const. which provides for a "national identity"--u're just a stinking, serial liar who lies. Sovereignty stands by itself--it does NOT "conform" to ANYTHING, idiot. No constitution could possibly "give" any sovereignty--it could only recognize and acknowledge it as something already existing, that's all.

Ur last sentence, "[w]hy they engaged...," makes no sense, which is typical for u, I'd say.

"Elite...," I don't know what u're "elite" at, as u're very ignorant and presumptuous, pretending u know anything, but u really ought to read the original Kentucky (by Jefferson) and Virginia (Madison) Resolutions, which go over the topic here which u brought up about "supremacy," etc.


------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------------

EliteCommInc. says:
December 24, 2018 at 6:38 am GMT
@apollonian

good grief,

the Supremacy Clause. That one little hiccup to all the gymnastics that each state ratified acknowledging the supremacy of the union they had just created.

Sure the states gave power to the union, they gave themselves over to a national identity. That does not make them independent nations. Their sovereignty had to conform to the Constitution, that’s what they agreed to.

And why they engaged the Supreme Court — thereby recognizing national authority and were bound to it as they expected others to be so bound.