* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"Parisian" Reveals Himself
(Apollonian, 16 Dec 18)
(Apollonian, 16 Dec 18)
Parisian Jew says, above, in reply to "Christo," "Not sure what the reliability of your source is." Then he adds, "One cannot say this american source is unbiased." So evidently, the Jew fm Paris pretends the soviets are Gospel truth.
Jew fm Paris replies to me as if he himself was actually present in Moscow and witnessed Hopkins talking to Stalin, "What they actually asked for was what had been promised: intervene in Europe far before 1944." And the pt. is Parisian Jew always wants to pretend and insist the Jews and bolshies speak truth and most reliably--everyone else is suspect, but not Jews and bolshies.
Golly gee, Parisian, but how is it we suspect u're Jew? Ho ho hoh o ho.
Then Parisian goes gushing to "digital," "Thus France had no motive to teach an History which would hide the USSR lend-lease, if it had been material." "Material"?--what's that supposed to mean?--that it simply asserts and repeats the communist party line, as pushed by Parisian?
So tell us Parisian: is there an OBJECTIVE standard?--and what would that be?--tell us.
-------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------
48.Parisian Guy says:
December 16, 2018 at 2:28 pm GMT • 100 Words
@Christo
Not sure what the reliability of your source is. For instance, it pretend that USSR used lot of US made planes, and went upto copy without permission the design of the Boeing B-29. But the B29 was not operational before the summer of 1944…
One cannot say this american source is unbiased.
My point is: all this story did not went public before the demise of USSR. If it was true, it would have not wait for so long. It looks like that story was not to sustainable before the USSR voice went mute.
There are other cases where USSR story has been rewritten after its death.
* * * * * * *
50.Parisian Guy says:
December 16, 2018 at 4:09 pm GMT
@apollonian
Stalin and Russkies themselves URGENTLY asked for tanks and planes
What they actually asked for was what had been promised: intervene in Europe far before 1944.
* * * * * * *
52.Parisian Guy says:
December 16, 2018 at 4:37 pm GMT • 100 Words
@Digital Samizdat
the principal beneficiary of the lend-lease act was not the USSR, but rather the UK
Thanks for getting the point with comparative datas.
That’s so true that lend-lease for UK was regular teaching at schools in France, but Lend-lease for USSR was never mentionned.
France was allways neutral or pro-US, depending the time or the matter. Thus France had no motive to teach an History which would hide the USSR lend-lease, if it had been material.
No comments:
Post a Comment