Typical faggot moralist, good buddy for kike Unz....

Below-copied by ap submitted, but CENSORED/deleted by kike, Unz, at comments,

http://www.unz.com/forum/new-zealand-shooting-49-are-dead-after-2-mosques-are-hit/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Precious, Little Colin, Once Again, Demonstrating His "Virtue," Ho Ho Ho
(Apollonian, 17 Mar 19)

Colin: just another stupid, lying punk, like about holohoax, taking the queer's opportunity to virtue signal, eh? Tell us, Colin: what's "evil"?--what's "good," sucker?--give the criterion, scummy little p.o.s.


----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied------------------

# 111, Colin Wright says:
March 17, 2019 at 4:00 pm GMT

The efforts of the Islamophobes to defend this pointless and evil atrocity are truly nauseating.

* * * * * * * *

Colin Jumps At Opportunity To Signal His Great Virtue (Not Having Any Brains), Ho Ho Ho

Colin, buddy, thou just needs to find a site w. people having low IQs as thine, sucker. The incident was most probably just another hoax, sucker--but of course, thou wishes to take opportunity to express thy virtue, not having any intelligence or discernment--typical of thy sort. Go thou and cut-off thy left-foot, and feel pain and dis-comfort, sucker--that way thou can feel "moral," eh?--ho ho ho ho ho ho.


----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------

# 116, Colin Wright says:
March 17, 2019 at 4:39 pm GMT • 200 Words

Anyway…

The replies on this thread led me to wonder, ‘just who are these people I’m associating with’?

After all, this is an event that separates the men from the boys, so to speak. However radical one’s dissent, presumably there is a moral line somewhere — unless one is truly lost to humanity. One can think Nazi Germany was bad — but agree the Russian sack of East Prussia and Silesia was a gratuituous evil all the the same. There’s a limit.

So how many here would defend an action like the mosque shooting — particularly given the availability of the truly nauseating details? So I did a count.

Obviously, there are numerous problems with a ‘statistic’ of this sort — not least of which is that who ‘approves’ and who ‘disapproves’ becomes subjective. Still, we seem to have forty posters who think the killing was beyond the pale — or have at least gone off on some tangent — and twenty four who are prepared to condone it in some form.

I’m not sure what to make of that. This is a community of compulsive iconoclasts — but still…