Below-copied by ap submitted, but CENSORED/deleted
by kike, Unz, at comments, http://www.unz.com/ldinh/hicks-vs-globalists/#comments
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
<blockquote>"A lot of the things that Western people cite lovingly about Christianity, the ‘nice Jesus’ stuff, is actually Buddhist material."</blockquote>
Above quotation by "brabantian," along w. the rest of his crap, is most brainless nonsense, deliberately taken out of the EXPLICIT context given in New Test., Christ carrying on a distinct DIALECTIC w. satanic, hereticalist Pharisees who pushed "midrash" (interpretation) and "Oral Law Tradition." See Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for Talmudic/Pharisaic expo.
In fact, it might be true that Christ seemed to emulate Buddhist sayings and notions, but Christ's ethics followed in perfect logic fm his (implicit) metaphysics, Christ = TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), hence endorsing the OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality, AGAINST hereticalist Pharisees featuring extreme subjectivism and satanism, foundation to their incessant lies and lying (JOHN 8:44).
Further, Christian objectivity is determinist (absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" will) and opposes and rejects Buddhist subjectivism featuring a perfectly "free" will leading to non-existent "good-evil" (Pelagian heresy, according to St. Augustine).
----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------
# 21, Brabantian says:
January 24, 2019 at 11:21 pm GMT • 600 Words
Hello Linh Dinh, your writing often has some quite quotable gems I note down, like this profound as well as lulzy one above:
but is there a more racist term than “people of color,” for it slots whites, again, as unique, if only to be pilloried
One particularly sharp expression of yours I often recall, was on how so much of the world was being sold on the idea of some kind of ‘Jewish saviour’, whether Jesus or Moses or Marx, or Mohammed too, very ‘Abrahamic’ as he was, a Jewess amongst his wives included.
Tech note for Linh Dinh – your photos are great, but the links to your Google blog are uncomfortable as I see them using Firefox, and discourage browsing that site or looking for more photos etc. When I click on a link above to your photo blog, I get an unappetising list of place names in an ugly block, and if I am persistent enough to scroll down, I see one photo. I am no web master or advisor, but you are probably missing a big audience for your lively work. I think Google has left its blog platform as rubbish because the Google goons in fact hate independent bloggers.
Regarding the Linh Dinh critique of Jewish saviours and Israel – which I see as having profound elements, unlike some commenters above –
This notion should be a much broader thread amidst the South, East, and South-East Asian religious viewpoints.
Some Hindus not caught up in the pro-Zionist dalliances of the typical India politician, have written scathingly of the ‘desert bloc’ religions, which, as Egypt’s Dr Ashraf Ezzat has noted, spawned the Abrahamic religions within a few hundred kilometres of each other, and all by the same kind of desert tribals, whom Ezzat has described as ‘extremist, fanatic, and of low culture’ … which is what can happen when life or death is all about who can hold possession of a rare watering hole (heaven) so you aren’t tormented in the heat (‘eternal hell’, as the barbaric Abrahamic idea goes).
Ezzat does interesting scholarship arguing the Jewish bible stories re Egypt are a hoax, and the Jews were probably in origin a group of devious Arab bandits from the Yemen region –
(a) Ancient Egypt had records on everything, but essentially zero re Jews and their ‘exodus’
(b) The oldest Bible text existent, is not in ‘Hebrew’, but the Greek Septuagint from Alexandria, where Jews possibly fabricated the whole thing a few centuries before Jesus, to glamourise themselves by linking to wondrous Egypt
(c) Israeli archaelologists, despite decades of fanatic searching, have found little to confirm ‘ancient Israel’ as in the ‘holy book’
A lot of the things that Western people cite lovingly about Christianity, the ‘nice Jesus’ stuff, is actually Buddhist material. E.g., Marcus Borg’s book, ‘Jesus & Buddha: The Parallel Sayings’ documents how some of Jesus’ most-loved phrases imitate Buddha hundreds of years earlier
Christianity is sometimes described as a ‘Buddhist shoot grafted to a Jewish root’ … Some say during Jesus’ ‘missing years’ between ages 15 & 29, Jesus either travelled to India or was influenced by Indian-origin teachers or traders in Palestine
Whereas one of the arguments against Christianity, is that, like Islam, it tends to foster a cult of Jewishness, always giving Jewish influence a leg up … some claiming that this is why the Jew Paul created Christianity for the Greco-Romans and the West, whilst other Jews created Islam for the Arabs, and rabbi’s grandson Karl Marx created yet another ‘Abrahamic religion’ for the ‘enlightened atheists’ … as Linh Dinh suggests, ‘Jewish saviours’ foisted upon us, in schemes that tend to erase the local culture and its goddesses and gods
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Christianity (The Real Thing) Features
Determinist Reality AGAINST Buddhist, Satanic, Judaic
Subjectivism
(Apollonian, 25 Jan 19)
(Apollonian, 25 Jan 19)
<blockquote>"A lot of the things that Western people cite lovingly about Christianity, the ‘nice Jesus’ stuff, is actually Buddhist material."</blockquote>
Above quotation by "brabantian," along w. the rest of his crap, is most brainless nonsense, deliberately taken out of the EXPLICIT context given in New Test., Christ carrying on a distinct DIALECTIC w. satanic, hereticalist Pharisees who pushed "midrash" (interpretation) and "Oral Law Tradition." See Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for Talmudic/Pharisaic expo.
In fact, it might be true that Christ seemed to emulate Buddhist sayings and notions, but Christ's ethics followed in perfect logic fm his (implicit) metaphysics, Christ = TRUTH (Gosp. JOHN 14:6), hence endorsing the OBJECTIVE (Aristotelian) reality, AGAINST hereticalist Pharisees featuring extreme subjectivism and satanism, foundation to their incessant lies and lying (JOHN 8:44).
Further, Christian objectivity is determinist (absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" will) and opposes and rejects Buddhist subjectivism featuring a perfectly "free" will leading to non-existent "good-evil" (Pelagian heresy, according to St. Augustine).
----------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------
# 21, Brabantian says:
January 24, 2019 at 11:21 pm GMT • 600 Words
Hello Linh Dinh, your writing often has some quite quotable gems I note down, like this profound as well as lulzy one above:
but is there a more racist term than “people of color,” for it slots whites, again, as unique, if only to be pilloried
One particularly sharp expression of yours I often recall, was on how so much of the world was being sold on the idea of some kind of ‘Jewish saviour’, whether Jesus or Moses or Marx, or Mohammed too, very ‘Abrahamic’ as he was, a Jewess amongst his wives included.
Tech note for Linh Dinh – your photos are great, but the links to your Google blog are uncomfortable as I see them using Firefox, and discourage browsing that site or looking for more photos etc. When I click on a link above to your photo blog, I get an unappetising list of place names in an ugly block, and if I am persistent enough to scroll down, I see one photo. I am no web master or advisor, but you are probably missing a big audience for your lively work. I think Google has left its blog platform as rubbish because the Google goons in fact hate independent bloggers.
Regarding the Linh Dinh critique of Jewish saviours and Israel – which I see as having profound elements, unlike some commenters above –
This notion should be a much broader thread amidst the South, East, and South-East Asian religious viewpoints.
Some Hindus not caught up in the pro-Zionist dalliances of the typical India politician, have written scathingly of the ‘desert bloc’ religions, which, as Egypt’s Dr Ashraf Ezzat has noted, spawned the Abrahamic religions within a few hundred kilometres of each other, and all by the same kind of desert tribals, whom Ezzat has described as ‘extremist, fanatic, and of low culture’ … which is what can happen when life or death is all about who can hold possession of a rare watering hole (heaven) so you aren’t tormented in the heat (‘eternal hell’, as the barbaric Abrahamic idea goes).
Ezzat does interesting scholarship arguing the Jewish bible stories re Egypt are a hoax, and the Jews were probably in origin a group of devious Arab bandits from the Yemen region –
(a) Ancient Egypt had records on everything, but essentially zero re Jews and their ‘exodus’
(b) The oldest Bible text existent, is not in ‘Hebrew’, but the Greek Septuagint from Alexandria, where Jews possibly fabricated the whole thing a few centuries before Jesus, to glamourise themselves by linking to wondrous Egypt
(c) Israeli archaelologists, despite decades of fanatic searching, have found little to confirm ‘ancient Israel’ as in the ‘holy book’
A lot of the things that Western people cite lovingly about Christianity, the ‘nice Jesus’ stuff, is actually Buddhist material. E.g., Marcus Borg’s book, ‘Jesus & Buddha: The Parallel Sayings’ documents how some of Jesus’ most-loved phrases imitate Buddha hundreds of years earlier
Christianity is sometimes described as a ‘Buddhist shoot grafted to a Jewish root’ … Some say during Jesus’ ‘missing years’ between ages 15 & 29, Jesus either travelled to India or was influenced by Indian-origin teachers or traders in Palestine
Whereas one of the arguments against Christianity, is that, like Islam, it tends to foster a cult of Jewishness, always giving Jewish influence a leg up … some claiming that this is why the Jew Paul created Christianity for the Greco-Romans and the West, whilst other Jews created Islam for the Arabs, and rabbi’s grandson Karl Marx created yet another ‘Abrahamic religion’ for the ‘enlightened atheists’ … as Linh Dinh suggests, ‘Jewish saviours’ foisted upon us, in schemes that tend to erase the local culture and its goddesses and gods
No comments:
Post a Comment