Actual facts are WWII was started by UK, France, and Poland--like UK and France started WWI too, along w. Russia and Serbia....

Below-copied by ap first submitted, but deleted/censored by the kike, Unz, at comments, http://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-.../#new_comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

It Was UK, France, And Poland Which Illegitimately Started WWII, Don't Forget
(Apollonian, 14 Jan 19)

Jilles tells us:

<blockquote>"In 1939 Hitler attacked Poland, no doubt about it."</blockquote>

But this, by Jilles, above, is only partially true. (a) In fact, Poland was steadily harassing and encroaching upon the German city of Danzig which it had announced it intended to take as its own, and that if Germany did not agree to Danzig becoming part of Poland, then IT MEANT WAR. See "The Forced War," by David Hoggan.

(b) Further, the Poles were deliberately murdering Germans who were in Poland who had stayed upon their properties when German territory was handed over to Poland after the Armistice of Nov. 1918. And it wasn't only a few murders of Germans by this Polish gov. policy, it evidently went up into the thousands according to credible reports.

(c) Further, note Poland had illegitimately taken territory fm Germany despite the plebiscites under League of Nations Auspices, in 1919-20, which had voted to remain German.

(d) These above-noted events took place in context of the UK-Polish OFFENSIVE alliance of March 1939 by which UK promised to go to war against Germany whenever Poland chose to attack, encouraging the Polish encroachments and harassment of Danzig, and the murderous persecution of Germans in Poland.

CONCLUSION: So the "attack" by Germany in 1939 must be understood as either "retaliatory" or "pre-emptive," even as COUNTER-attack, deliberately provoked by Poland which had threatened Germany w. war should the Germans resist or not consent to the Polish taking of German city of Danzig. Regardless, the Germans possessed legitimate claim to genuine casus belli w. respect to Poland. And it was upon this pretext of German-Polish strife and combat, provoked by Poland, not Germany, encouraged by UK, that UK and France subsequently declared illegitimate war against Germany, UK and France the ones who STARTED WWII--just as they, along w. Russia and Serbia, deliberately started WWI.


--------------------above by ap in response to below-copied-------------------

# 24, jilles dykstra says:Next New Comment
January 14, 2019 at 9:01 am GMT • 400 Words

Anyone can make a mistake, but the fact that this misinformation has remained so widespread for so many years suggests the rather unreliable quality of most anti-immigration sources across the Internet.

I had to smile when I read this.

The holy trinity was a compromise agreed on in Cyprus in the third or fourth century.

Intellectuals all the time saw the nonsense, wrote or talked about it, and lost their lives, often in horrible ways, such as Servetius who was burned alive around 1600 by Calvin in Geneva, on green wood, so that he suffered longer.

There still are historians who write or wrote books on how Bismarck in 1870 provoked the French attack on what now is Germany by publicising a telegram from a Kaiser offended by a French diplomat to Bismarck.

Anyone with some common sense can understand that a few lines cannot start a war.

In 1914 there were the Serajewo murders, the same story, how killing two people, even two Habsburgs, in itself can start the first world war, defies all common sense.

In 1939 Hitler attacked Poland, no doubt about it. The beginning of the execution of his plan for world domination.

Until today nobody has explained how a 44 million people could dominate the whole word.

This despite that the USSR was unable to dominate E Europe, that the USA was and is unable to dominate the world.

At present we have the CO2 madness. Figures about CO2 ppm can be found anywhere. These figures show without any doubt that at the present CO2 ppm levels there is no problem whatsoever. Yet mankind seems intent on executing the most expensive experiment ever in human history, not just expensive in money, but expensive in destroying the European cultures.

I could go on about nonsensical ideas, from slavery to fixed currency exchange rates, even Keynes, Bretton Woods believed in this, the euro is partly based on this nonsense, but what is the point ?

Homo sapiens is hardly rational, seen in evolution, also a nonsense idea, there is no evolution, conciousness came very late.

So what are some misunderstandings about immigration in the USA ?

This is not so say that these misunderstandings, deliberate, thus in fact propaganda, or simply by lack of critical analysis, are not important, they often are, the word important here a big understatement.