Jewwy psycho just repeats, insists....

Below-copied by ap first submitted, but deleted and censored by Jew, Unz, at comments, http://www.unz.com/pgottfried/the-de...tism/#comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"Corvinus" Has No Arguments, No Reasoning, Just Psychotic, Repetitious Insistence
(Apollonian, 11 Jan 19)

<blockquote>"...[T]he trial of strength decided the legalities in favor of the north."</blockquote>

Coag: doeth thou graspeth what thou saith? There was NOTHING "legal" decided in favor of scummy, murdering filth (north). For it's like saying if I sneak-up, knocking thou in the head, then stealing thy wallet--that then "decides" the legality, my now legally owning thy wallet. Get a clue, buddy.

Feds never had anything but DELEGATED powers which were duly un-delegated. "Corvinus" can't even begin to demonstrating how states lost sovereignty--the guy is just hopelessly ignorant moron.

"Corvinus" is simply a psychotic liar who obsessively insists states were/are slaves of a non-existent "nation," when it's been explained to the poor fool states were always sovereign, sovereignty something that can't be alienated--his poor peanut-sized brain cannot grasp concept (of sovereignty).

Of course, "corvinus" doesn't want to face fact he's psycho and probably will need to be dealt w. in summary, revolutionary fashion--something which will easily be done when time comes, I'm sure.


-------------------above by ap in response to below-copied---------------------

# 236, Coag says:
January 10, 2019 at 11:30 pm GMT • 100 Words
@Corvinus

From the southern perspective the north and south were two separate nations joined in consensual union, and when the union ceased to be useful to the south, the south lawfully seceded but were invaded by the north.

The southern perspective was no more right or wrong than your northern perspective on such things, but the trial of strength decided the legalities in favor of the north.