Sometimes contempt is the best response, and clicking "LOL" is good way--even better--as any other....

 Below-copied by ap submitted at comments, http://www.unz.com/gdurocher/the-con.../#new_comments

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Petey-Pete Doesn't Say Why Unc' Adolf, Himmler, Or Goebbels Are NOT "Aryan"
(Apollonian, 23 Jan 19)

<blockquote>"Like, for example, the Aryan ideal: tall, blond, blue eyes. Something like Hitler, Himmler and Goebbels, for example."</blockquote>

Is Petey-pete being sardonic?--AGAIN?--ho hoo ho ho oho

"Aryan ideal"?--as distinct fm what? For note there are wide, general distinctions, like "Ham, Shem, and Japhet," though these are only partial and not clear for particular traits. Then there is Caucasian, Negroid, and Mongolian, but these are too broad for many if not most.

But Petey-pete, WHAT is it exactly that would exclude dear, heroic unc' Adolf, Heinrich Himmler, or good old Joe Goebbels fm "Aryan"? Thou are such brilliant know-it-all (tee-hee-hee)--tell us.

And then Petey-pete, don't forget the two basic philosophic divisions, aside fm objective (Christian, Aristotelian) vs. (Jew "midrash") subjective--regarding basic nature of reality. And that regards (a) determinist (absolute cause-effect, no perfectly "free" will), following fm the objective, and (b) perfectly "free," God-like will, especially regarding "good-evil," following fm subjective, etc.

Thus following the determinist philosophy, race, like anything else, is important, whereas in thy satanic (perfectly "free" will, pretending thou are like God) philosophy, it doesn't matter, right?--"do what thou wilt," right, petey-pete? Tell us all about it.


-----------------above by ap in response to below-copied-----------------

#421, peterAUS says:
January 24, 2019 at 1:23 am GMT • 100 Words
@Malacaay

Let’s try again, I didn’t quite get what you were trying to say. My fault, entirely.

Australia example didn’t work. Pity, but makes sense. Not enough of specimens to compare.

But, I guess, in Split, for example, we should be able to see plenty of examples of those types: the Illyrian (Übermensch) and Croatian/whatever (untermensch).

Say, how would YOU distinguish between them in, for example, a pub?
You walk in, take a look, even listen a bit, and you just know who’s who?

I am sure you’ve developed quite an effective system.
Care to share that with me (maybe even some “us”) here?

Shape of head? Height? Hair/eyes color?
Nose?
Accent?

Like, for example, the Aryan ideal: tall, blond, blue eyes. Something like Hitler, Himmler and Goebbels, for example.


----------------------------below-copied are responses by PeterAUS to above by ap------------------------

# 424 peterAUS says:
January 24, 2019 at 3:32 am GMT • 100 Words
@apollonian

Now, for some reason you’ve slipped through my “ignore list” but, on the positive side, among that usual psychopathic rambling of yours, something did catch my eye:

….don’t forget the two basic philosophic divisions, aside fm objective (Christian, Aristotelian) vs. (Jew “midrash”) subjective–regarding basic nature of reality…

What’s your take on that, occult, element of Nazi regime? Adolf really believed, even practiced, all that?
You know, “The Sword of Destiny”, “The Occult Roots of Nazism” etc.I am sure you’ve read all that.
C’mon, if you can write something of a value there you are allowed to put that “ho hoo ho ho oho” in each paragraph. Imagine that. What a pleasure, a?
• LOL: apollonian


-----------------------------------------

# 425, peterAUS says:
January 24, 2019 at 4:19 am GMT
@peterAUS

Wait….

• LOL: apollonian

you are chickening out? Really?

All that knowledge and erudition, let alone attitude, and…”blop”.

You are even going to say you haven’t read those books?!?

That’s just…….disappointing.
• LOL: apollonian